← All comparisons
Dermapedia / CompareProcedures

Vanquish vs CoolSculpting

Vanquish is better for a broad abdomen with nothing to grip. Panels held above the skin send a radiofrequency field that heats the fat layer without touching you. CoolSculpting is better for a pocket of fat you can hold between your fingers. An applicator clamps a fold of tissue and freezes it for 35 to 60 minutes.

At a glance

The differenceVanquishCoolSculpting
CostNo published price$3,268 on average, $750 to $8,800

Vanquish

About four weekly sessions of 45 minutes Panels sit above the abdomen and send a radiofrequency field through the tissue. Nothing touches your skin. The energy is said to gather in fat rather than in the skin above it, and it warms the fat layer. That session count comes from clinic pages, not from a trial.

CoolSculpting

A gloved hand holding a large white cooling applicator against a woman's abdomen as she lies on a treatment bed

Side by side

The differences that matter

9 comparison points

What you actually do

Vanquish

About four weekly sessions of 45 minutes

Panels sit above the abdomen and send a radiofrequency field through the tissue. Nothing touches your skin. The energy is said to gather in fat rather than in the skin above it, and it warms the fat layer. That session count comes from clinic pages, not from a trial.

CoolSculpting

One or more freezing cycles per area

An applicator draws a fold of tissue against a chilled plate and holds it there for 35 to 60 minutes. Cold harms fat cells more easily than skin, nerves or muscle. In the largest real-world review, of 3,262 patients, the median was 1 session and 4 cycles.

What you can expect to see

Vanquish

A smaller waist measurement

Thirteen patients came back four years after treatment. They had lost 5.88 cm off the waist at first. At four years they were 4.42 cm below where they started, about three quarters of the original change.

CoolSculpting

A thinner fat layer where it is applied

The FDA's own pooled review put the average drop in the fat layer at 21%, across a range of 10% to 26%. An independent trial found about 14%.

What it will not do

Vanquish

Not for anywhere but the abdomen and waist

Nothing is clamped on, so it does not need a bulge to grip. But the published work covers the waist and abdomen, not other areas.

CoolSculpting

Not for a flat area with nothing to pinch

The vacuum cup needs tissue to draw into it. It covers seven named body areas, plus under the chin and jaw.

The downside

Vanquish

Warmth, and little else reported

The four-year follow-up reported no long-term side effects. But that was only thirteen people.

CoolSculpting

Numb, red and firm for days to weeks

Bruising from the vacuum is common. So is pain that starts a few days later. One review of 554 procedures found it lasted 3 to 11 days.

Cost

Vanquish

No published price

No average and no price range have been published for Vanquish.

CoolSculpting

$3,268 on average, $750 to $8,800

That is self-reported by 1,928 RealSelf reviewers. It is priced per cycle, not per session.

The at-home or drugstore version

Vanquish

No home version of the machine

Handheld radiofrequency wands are sold for home use. They put far less power into the surface, and the energy does not reach the depth in the fat layer that clinic panels work at.

CoolSculpting

Freezing at home is not the same

Ice packs and cold wraps only cool the skin. The clinic device holds a fold of fat at a set low temperature for up to an hour. An ice pack cannot do that, and cooling your own skin that hard is a way to injure it.

Who tends to be happy with it

Vanquish

  • Best for - Someone who wants a warm, hands-off treatment of the abdomen.
  • The mindset - A weekly course, a tape measure, and a change in size rather than a promise about fat.

CoolSculpting

  • Best for - Someone near a stable weight with a defined bulge and fairly firm skin over it.
  • The mindset - One area, one problem, volume only, and a wait of two to three months.

Before you book

CoolSculpting

Three blood disorders rule CoolSculpting out. In each one, the blood reacts badly to cold. They are cryoglobulinemia, cold agglutinin disease and paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria.

The fine print

CoolSculpting

CoolSculpting's paperwork is easier to follow. A De Novo authorisation, DEN090002, was granted 24 August 2010 and created the FDA device category for cryolipolysis. Thirteen later 510(k) clearances added body areas and body mass index limits. The claim is cold-assisted lipolysis of the upper arm, bra fat, back fat, banana roll, thigh, abdomen and flank, in people with a body mass index of 30 or less. CoolSculpting Elite is K212707, cleared 5 November 2021. Under the chin and jaw are cleared separately, up to a body mass index of 46.2. Blinded photo picking is the main endpoint in most of these clearances, which is a spot-the-difference test rather than a measurement of fat.

Common questions

Questions Patients Ask

Is Vanquish FDA cleared?

FDA does not publish a link between BTL's trade names and its clearance numbers, so no record confirms which filing "Vanquish" is sold under. Searching the 510(k) database by the device name Vanquish returns only an unrelated urology device from another company. But two BTL radiofrequency clearances do carry body claims of the right shape. K143559 (XP1000 RF, 11 June 2015) is cleared for "temporary reduction in circumference of the abdomen". K152731 (XP1100 RF, 20 July 2016) is cleared for "temporary reduction in circumference of the abdomen and thighs". Note what those say: a temporary reduction in circumference, not lipolysis and not fat reduction. Ask the clinic for the K-number on the machine.

Why does the clearance matter if the treatment works?

Because a clearance tells you what the device was permitted to claim, and by extension what it was evaluated on. A 510(k) is a finding of substantial equivalence to an existing device, not proof of benefit - but the Indications for Use wording is the difference between "deep heating for the relief of pain" and "non-invasive lipolysis of the abdomen". Those are different claims about the same machine.

Does Vanquish hurt?

It should not, in the sense that nothing touches you. The treatment is a warm radiofrequency field delivered from panels above the abdomen, and the four-year follow-up study reported no long-term side effects. No manufacturer instructions for use were available to check for labelled warnings, which is worth asking the clinic about directly.

How long do Vanquish results last?

The one long follow-up recalled thirteen patients at four years and found them still about 4.4 cm below their baseline waist measurement, roughly three quarters of the original reduction, despite having gained half a kilogram since. Thirteen people is a very small group, and in the original treatment period they also lost 1.29 kg, so part of the initial change was weight rather than treatment.

Which one covers more of the body?

CoolSculpting, by a distance. Its clearances name seven body regions plus the areas under the chin and jaw. The published work on Vanquish is on the waist and abdomen. The two BTL circumference clearances name the abdomen, and in the later one the thighs as well.

Is one of them safer?

They fail differently and neither has a clean answer. Cryolipolysis has by far the larger record, including a specific rare complication that needs surgery to correct. Vanquish has a small published record with no long-term side effects reported, and no manufacturer safety document that could be examined. An absence of reported problems in thirteen people is not the same as a safety record.

Will either one help me lose weight?

No. The FDA states that non-invasive body contouring will not result in weight loss, and CoolSculpting's manufacturer says the same about its own procedure. A pooled analysis of cryolipolysis studies found no significant weight change. Both are aimed at the shape of one area.

Safety to keep in mind

The paperwork here is lopsided.

FDA does not publish a link between BTL's trade names and its clearance numbers, so no public record confirms which filing "Vanquish" is sold under. BTL holds 49 510(k) records in all, most of them cleared for other things.

Two BTL radiofrequency clearances do carry body claims of the right shape. K143559 covers the XP1000 RF, decided 11 June 2015, for "temporary reduction in circumference of the abdomen". K152731 covers the XP1100 RF, decided 20 July 2016, for the abdomen and thighs. Neither claims fat, lipolysis or a lasting change. The word in both is temporary, and the thing reduced is a tape measurement, not the thickness of a fat layer.

A 510(k) clearance is a finding that a device is much the same as one already on sale. It is not a finding that the device works. That is true of every clearance on this page, on both sides.