RF Microneedling
An RF microneedling handpiece on the cheekbone. The needles carry heat to a set depth, and that depth is chosen on the console before each pass.
← All comparisons
Dermapedia / CompareProcedures
RF Microneedling vs SkinPen
Radiofrequency microneedling is the better choice for laxity and for anything that needs depth. It makes tiny channels in the skin, then releases heat several millimetres down. SkinPen is better value for texture, fine lines and acne scars. It makes the same channels and stops there — and no trial has ever compared the two.
At a glance
| The difference | RF Microneedling | SkinPen |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Needles that carry heat into the dermis | A motorised pen of fine needles, no energy |
| What it is best at | Laxity and texture, plus acne scars | Acne scars, texture and fine lines |
| Downtime | Redness in almost everyone, 3 to 4 days | Redness like sunburn, 1 to 3 days |
| Cost | Well above a mechanical session | Much lower per session |
SkinPen
The SkinPen up close. The disposable cartridge on the front holds the needles, and it is changed for every patient.
Side by side
The differences that matter
What it is
RF Microneedling
Needles that carry heat into the dermis
The needles may be insulated, so energy comes out only at the tip. Or they may be bare, so energy travels the whole shaft.
SkinPen
A motorised pen of fine needles, no energy
The effect comes from the wound alone, and how the skin heals it.
How it works
RF Microneedling
Wound plus controlled heat
The channel is made first. Then radiofrequency heats a small column of tissue around each needle. Heat contracts collagen straight away, and the skin remodels over months. Radiofrequency does not target pigment, so it is largely colour-blind. That is one reason it is used across skin tones where ablative lasers carry more pigment risk.
SkinPen
Wound only
Thousands of tiny channels set off the skin's repair work. New collagen follows. Nothing is heated.
How it works, illustrated
RF Microneedling
How deep it goes
RF Microneedling
Roughly 0.3 mm to 7 mm, by device and tip
The range depends on the machine and the tip fitted to it.
SkinPen
0 to 2.5 mm
Its main study used needles no longer than 2.5 mm.
What it is best at
RF Microneedling
Laxity and texture, plus acne scars
The best data is for acne scars. In a split-face trial, radiofrequency microneedling matched a fractional CO2 laser, with less redness and fewer pigment changes.
SkinPen
Acne scars, texture and fine lines
It also treats neck wrinkles. It does not tighten lax tissue, and it has no effect on fat or contour.
Conditions treated
RF Microneedling
Acne Scarring
Needles carry heat below the surface, so it builds more collagen than needling alone while doing less to the top layer. That lower surface injury is why it is often the first choice for boxcar and rolling scars on deeper skin tones. Usually three or four sessions about a month apart, with the result still building for a year.
1 / 3→
Stretch Marks
Microneedling with radiofrequency heat delivered at the needle tips, which reaches deeper into the scarred layer. Reported results are modest improvements in texture and firmness over a course of sessions. Because the energy is not aimed at pigment, it is another option worth discussing on deeper skin tones.
←2 / 3→
Wrinkles and Fine Lines
Microneedling with radiofrequency heat delivered at the needle tips, aimed at the deeper dermis. It does more for early laxity along the jaw and lower face than plain microneedling does, over three or so sessions. The heat is not carried by pigment, so it is comparatively safe on deeper skin tones, and the result is well short of surgery.
←3 / 3
Downtime
RF Microneedling
Redness in almost everyone, 3 to 4 days
One study of 44 patients found redness in 100% and swelling in 30%. Radiofrequency also leaves a visible grid of entry points, because the needles sit in a fixed array. Nobody has measured how long it takes to fade.
SkinPen
Redness like sunburn, 1 to 3 days
Mild swelling comes with it. That is the usual clinical description.
Comfort
RF Microneedling
The heat is felt; deeper settings hurt more
Topical numbing is standard.
SkinPen
More tolerable, being mechanical only
Topical numbing is standard here too.
Sessions
RF Microneedling
Commonly three, 3 to 8 weeks apart
That is practice habit, not a trial result.
SkinPen
Typically three to six, 4 weeks apart
This is common practice too.
Cost
RF Microneedling
Well above a mechanical session
The single-use tips are expensive, and they are thrown away after each treatment. That cost is the main reason the price sits so much higher.
SkinPen
Much lower per session
The usual course is three to six sessions. Budget for the course, not one visit.
The at-home or drugstore version
RF Microneedling
There is no home version
Home radiofrequency wands press against the surface of the skin. They put in a fraction of the power, and have no needles to carry it into the dermis. That is the only place the treatment does anything.
SkinPen
Rollers and home pens
A roller drags sideways across the skin instead of going straight in and out, so it tears more than it punctures. Home needles are shorter and blunt quickly, and a blunt needle does more damage than a sharp one.
Who tends to be happy with it
RF Microneedling
- Best for — Someone whose main concern is laxity or a soft jawline, or who wants scar work with less pigment risk than a laser.
- The mindset — A wound plus a burn, a bigger bill, and a real if unmeasured risk of fat loss, in exchange for depth.
SkinPen
- Best for — Someone whose concern is texture, fine lines or acne scars, and who wants the option with a cosmetic clearance behind it.
- The mindset — Little and often, at a much lower cost per session, with no expectation of tightening.
The extra risks that come with heat
Related topic illustrations
RF Microneedling
Fractional CO2 laser
Strong evidence, and still the most effective option for indented acne scars. Better results, a week of real downtime, higher cost, and a substantially higher risk of lasting pigment change on deeper skin tones.
The fine print
SkinPen
SkinPen holds a real cosmetic authorisation. It was the first microneedling device authorised in the US. Its grant (DEN160029, 1 March 2018) created the category, 21 CFR 878.4430, product code QAI. It covers facial acne scars in adults aged 22 and over. Neck wrinkles were added by K202243 in April 2021.
Safety before RF microneedling
RF Microneedling
RF microneedling can cause serious injury. The FDA has received reports of burns, scarring, loss of fat, nerve damage and disfigurement. Some injuries have needed surgery or other medical treatment. A few days of expected redness is not the full risk picture.
Common questions
Questions Patients Ask
Does adding radiofrequency to microneedling give a better result?
For laxity, it is the only one of the two with a mechanism that could — mechanical microneedling cannot heat or contract collagen. For acne scars and texture, both work, and no published trial has compared them directly, so nobody can tell you the size of the difference.
Which is FDA cleared for more?
SkinPen, oddly enough. It holds a De Novo authorisation for facial acne scars in all Fitzpatrick types and neck wrinkles in Fitzpatrick II–IV. Most RF microneedling devices are cleared only for electrocoagulation and hemostasis, which names no cosmetic use at all.
Is RF microneedling worth the extra cost?
It depends on what you want changed. The extra cost is largely the single-use tip. If your concern is texture, fine lines or atrophic scarring, the cheaper treatment has the clearer authorisation. If it is laxity, mechanical microneedling has no mechanism to offer you.
Does SkinPen hurt less?
Probably, but no study has measured it. RF microneedling adds heat to the needling, which is why it is generally described as the more uncomfortable of the two, and deeper settings are the uncomfortable ones. That is clinical description, not a measured finding — no trial has compared the pain of the two treatments. Topical numbing is standard for both.
Which is safer?
Both are needle procedures, so both carry infection risk through open channels. Radiofrequency adds two problems mechanical needling does not have — burns and subcutaneous fat loss — both of which appear in the FDA's adverse-event reports for the class. Mechanical microneedling has its own documented issue with granulomas, usually linked to products applied afterwards.
Can I have both?
They are usually used at different times rather than together. Because no comparative trial exists, sequencing is a matter of clinical judgement rather than evidence.
How many sessions does each need?
Published RF protocols cluster around three sessions three to eight weeks apart. Mechanical microneedling is conventionally three to six sessions about four weeks apart. Neither number comes from a dose-finding study.
Safety to keep in mind
Burns and fat loss are the two problems mechanical microneedling cannot cause. Both need heat. An analysis of FDA adverse-event reports for radiofrequency microneedling, from 2013 to 2025, found 114 reports covering 224 events.
Those numbers are not your own odds. Reporting is voluntary, and nobody knows how many people were treated.
The fat-loss evidence is mixed. One study measured the fat layer under the chin in 30 people after treatment. It found no significant change.
Choose a licensed medical professional trained on the device. Discuss the risks and other treatment options before deciding. RF microneedling should not be done at home.